Organic is more nutritious according to the French

3 September 2009

Print this article Comments Bookmark and Share

A new report by the French Agency for Food Safety (AFSSA) has found that organic foods are better for you and contain less pesticides and nitrates, which have been linked to a range of health problems including diabetes and Alzheimer’s.

Andre Leu, Chairman of the Organic Federation of Australia, says the up-to-date exhaustive and critical evaluation of the nutritional quality of organic food and has found organic foods have higher levels of minerals and antioxidants.’

"The AFSSA study has been published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Agronomy for Sustainable Development ensuring that it has met rigorous scientific standards," Leu said.

The major points of The French Agency for Food Safety study are:

1. Organic plant products contain more dry matter (more nutrient dense)

2. Have higher levels of minerals

3. Contain more anti-oxidants such as phenols and salicylic acid (known to protect against cancers, heart disease and many other health problems)

4. Organic animal products contain more polyunsaturated fatty acids (protect against heart disease)

5. Carbohydrate, protein and vitamin levels are insufficiently documented

6. 94–100% of organic foods do not contain any pesticide residues

7. Organic vegetables contain far less nitrates, about 50% less (high nitrate levels are linked to a range of health problems including diabetes and Alzheimer’s)

8. Organic cereals contain similar levels of mycotoxins as conventional ones

In 2001, the French Agency for Food Safety (AFSSA) set up an expert working group to perform an exhaustive and critical evaluation of the nutritional and sanitary quality of organic food.

The AFSSA says they aimed for the highest quality scientific standards during the evaluation. The selected papers referred to well-defined and certified organic agricultural practices, and had the necessary information on design and follow-up, valid measured parameters and the appropriate sampling and statistical analyses.

After more than two years of work involving about 50 experts from all specific areas including organic agriculture, a final consensus report was issued in the French language in 2003.

The current study published in the peer reviewed journal, in English, is a summary of this report and the relevant studies that have been published since 2003.

The conclusions of this study are different from the recent UK Food Standard Agency Study that was widely criticised by international experts for using flawed methodology and a conclusion that contradicted its own data.

The full scientific report can be found at http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/organic/ASD_Lairon_2009.pdf

 

Tags: ‘The French Agency for Food Safety (AFSSA) | Australian food industry | organic foods

Just in:


Add a comment3 Comments

  1. seaveg | 22 October, 2009 at 02:12 PM
    This informative post has the potent to give precise info about the dietary supplements that have positive effect on our health. seaveg is another product that is prepared from nutrients of see weeds and extremely useful for our body’s natural mechanism.
  2. Byron Ray | 20 September, 2009 at 02:46 AM
    It's kind of a no-brainer that food grown with synthetic pesticides and herbicides in an assembly line like fashion (churn-it-out-as-fast-as-possible) such as industrial agriculture practices is not going to have the same nutrition levels as food grown with more care. This shouldn't even need explaining. But in today's world of right-wing spin where right is wrong and lies are truth organic is bad for you while drinking a glass of Roundup healthy.
  3. James Ingrassi | 12 September, 2009 at 03:01 AM
    Though I'd love for all this to be true, you exaggerate the findings of the meta-study. In point 1, you fail to disambiguate tubers/shoots/leafy greens from fruits/vegetables. From section 2.1 of the paper, "no significant difference has been identified for fruit vegetables and fruit." I could go on and on... Read the research, not the overcredulous summary of it.

Add a new comment

Enter the code shown: